Merlin’s weekly podcast with Dan Benjamin. We talk about creativity, independence, and making things you love.
Merlin’s weekly podcast with Dan Benjamin. We talk about creativity, independence, and making things you love.
”What’s 43 Folders?”
43Folders.com is Merlin Mann’s website about finding the time and attention to do your best creative work.
Index Card Printer Review: Canon Pixma iP3000
Merlin Mann | Jun 27 2005
The Hipster PDA has been extended and improved beyond my wildest dreams thanks to things like GTDTiddlyWiki, Douglas Johnston’s DIY Planner, and John Norris’s very creative templates. With this growth and interest have come a lot of requests from readers for the best, cheapest, and most Mac-friendly printer for printing directly to ordinary index cards. I’ve shared this interest since, frankly, I’ve been buffaloed as well—crippled by the crappiness of my old Epson and unsure what to try next. So I did what I always do: I asked for help. Even as I started asking for reader advice on inexpensive printers that handle standard index cards well, I had a feeling this was going to be a tough post to put together. This was borne out by the very wide range of suggestions you all submitted—over 30 different models by most all the major companies were mentioned (although only 4 got mentioned more than once)—as well as the plain fact it’s virtually impossible to give meaningful advice on a product you’ve never used. Duh, right? Anyhow, to put this together, I’ve adopted a blended approach. First, I took everyone’s suggestions (and warnings), compiled a tally count, and then did a bit of extra research on CNET, Epinions, etc. (including a couple phone calls to sales support and some assorted friends). But, in the end, I decided to put my real-life money where my mouth theoretically should be: I popped in to CompUSA on Saturday morning and bought the recommended model that looked best to me—the Canon Pixma iP3000—and then spent the rest of the weekend testing it out. See how much I love you guys? The Winner: Canon Pixma iP3000 Photo Printer
This sexy little number looks like a toaster oven from 2001 and has an awful lot of cool features given its sub-$100 price tag. Most importantly for our purposes, it takes a big pile of regular old, drug-store index cards and prints whatever you want onto them at a clip of about 10 seconds per card. It also has a 150-sheet, cassette-loading paper drawer (similar to those on the old LaserWriters). This means that you can load up the tray with plain printer paper without removing your blank cards from the top loader —no juggling, and no disruption to your “normal printing.” It’s a great photo printer and a fast, middle-quality text printer, but if you’re looking for a cheap way to print index cards from your Mac, I think this is a great choice. iP3000 ProsI’ll leave the details and deeper nerdery to other reviews and the spec sheet, but here’s a few of the reasons I’m really satisfied with this decision.
iP3000 ConsMy beefs so far:
Other Interesting Canon Options
SummaryGiven that I’ve been using the iP3000 less than 48 hours, I can’t promise I’ve covered every angle here, but I can say it looks swell, prints fast, and spits out index cards like a freaking demon. It also has a variety of features and flexibility normally found only in more costly models. Considering the price and extra incentives available right now, this is a splendid deal and my top recommendation, especially for Mac users.
The Also-Rans
More Input?I encourage you to read all the suggestions in both the Google Group and last week’s thread to get a fuller feel for what people recommended. Also, if you caught any errors or if anything in this was confusing, please do let me know (this was a lot more ground to cover than I had anticipated). Many thanks to everyone who made recommendations and helped to shape this review. The floor is still open, of course, so feel free to add your favorite index card printer here in comments. Technorati Tags: 43folders, canon, hipsterpda, indexcards, printers, reviews 34 Comments
POSTED IN:
Further note (and maybe this...Submitted by Terry Bain (not verified) on June 27, 2005 - 7:48am.
Further note (and maybe this has been noted before), I prefer 4x6 index cards, and therefore my "standard" size is also usually available for photo printers, as 4x6 is generally a standard option (this is not always true if the printer is on a network, but if it's directly connected via usb, I can always select 4x6). This is true (I believe) because 35mm film always had less cropping at 4x6 (if you wanted 3x5 photos, a great deal of the photo would be cropped). So, this odd characterisic carries over even today, and standard size photo paper tends to be 4x6, even though the standard electronic photo requires that a 4x6 be cropped. I feel an essay coming on, so I'll stop myself from yacking on aout this here. For now. » POSTED IN:
|
|
EXPLORE 43Folders | THE GOOD STUFF |